Advances and residual knowledge gaps in the neck management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with advanced nodal disease undergoing definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for their primary.

PURPOSE: Substantial changes have been made in the neck management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) in the past century. These have been fostered by changes in cancer epidemiology and technological progress in imaging, surgery, or radiotherapy, as well as disruptive concepts in oncology. We aimed to review changes in nodal management, with a focus on HNSCC patients with nodal involvement (cN+) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted to review current advances and address knowledge gaps in the multidisciplinary management of the cN+ neck in the context of (chemo)radiotherapy. RESULTS: Metastatic neck nodes are associated with poorer prognosis and poorer response to radiotherapy, and have therefore been systematically treated by surgery. Radical neck dissection (ND) has gradually evolved toward more personalized and less morbid approaches, i.e., from functional to selective ND. Omission of ND has been made feasible by use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to monitor the radiation response in cN+ patients. Human papillomavirus-driven oropharyngeal cancers and their cystic nodes have shown dramatically better prognosis than tobacco-related cancers, justifying a specific prognostic classification (AJCC) creation. Finally, considering the role of lymph nodes in anti-tumor immunity, de-escalation of ND and prophylactic nodal irradiation in combination are intense areas of investigation. However, the management of bulky cN3 disease remains an issue, as aggressive multidisciplinary strategies or innovative combined treatments have not yet significantly improved their prognosis. CONCLUSION: Personalized neck management is an increasingly important aspect of the overall therapeutic strategies in cN+ HNSCC.

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study to detect pharyngeal leak after total (pharyngo-) laryngectomy: Retrospective assessment of a single-institution protocol.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a single-institution protocol of videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) for the detection of pharyngeal leak (PL) and its usefulness to mitigate evolution into subsequent pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) after total (pharyngo-) laryngectomy (TL). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was conducted between February 2014 and December 2022. We included all patients who underwent TL and performed a VFSS between Day 7 and Day 14 postoperatively to detect a subclinical PL. RESULTS: Two-hundred and forty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the 186 patients (75%) with a negative VFSS, 11 patients (5.9%) developed a secondary PCF after oral intake resumption (false negative of VFSS). Among the 62 patients (25%) with a positive VFSS, the occurrence of a PCF was avoided in 59.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: This study showed a good effectiveness of VFSS in the detection of PL after TL, alongside a usefulness to mitigate evolution into subsequent PCF.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasal Vestibule: A Multi-Centric Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule (NV-SCC) is a rare but challenging entity, due to the complex anatomy of the region. Consensus on the best treatment strategy is still lacking, as well as a dedicated staging system. Our aim was to analyze oncological outcomes of surgically treated patients and to investigate possible prognostic factors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multi-centric observational study including six Academic Hospitals over a 10-year period, including only patients who underwent upfront surgery for primary NV-SCC. Patients were staged according to all currently available staging systems. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute overall, disease-free, and disease-specific survival. Logistic regression models were used to correlate between survival outcomes and clinical and pathological variables. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients with a median follow-up of 38 months were included in the study. Partial and total rhinectomy were the most commonly performed procedures, respectively, in 49.3% and 25.4% of cases. Neck dissection was performed on 31% of patients, and 45.1% of them underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Three years overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival were, respectively, 86.5%, 90.3%, and 74.2%. None of the currently available staging systems were able to effectively stratify survival outcomes. Factors predicting lower overall survival on multivariate analysis were age (p = 0.021) and perineural invasion (p = 0.059), whereas disease-free survival was negatively affected by age (p = 0.033) and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Currently available staging systems cannot stratify prognosis for patients who underwent surgery for NV-SCC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2023.

[Rare cancers of the head and neck on behalf of the REFCOR, part 2]. / Cancers rares de la tête et du cou sous l'égide du REFCOR, partie 2.

Among the 16,000 new cases of malignant tumors of the head and neck diagnosed in France each year, 10% are not conventional squamous cell carcinomas. These so-called rare cancers are distinguished by their presentation and patterns of failure, which is important to recognize in order to offer specific adapted management and maximize the chances of tumor control. These cancers can be rare by their histology as well as their anatomical location when arising from the paranasal sinuses, salivary glands and ear. The management of these heterogeneous rare diseases of complex treatment has considerably been structured over the last 15 years, in particular via the French ENT Cancer Expertise Network (REFCOR) and international networks and registries (EURACAN, etc.). Structuration also favors research with identification of new entities and setting up of specific therapeutic trials. A first article (part 1) discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic specificities of these rare cancers, and develops the recommendations of the REFCOR concerning rare epithelial tumors, i.e., salivary tumors, sinonasal tumors, variants of conventional squamous cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas, malignant odontogenic tumors, and ear tumors. This second article (part 2) is focused on non-epithelial tumors (sarcomas, mucosal melanomas, lymphomas, tumors of uncertain or undetermined malignancy) and describes the organization and missions of the REFCOR.

[Rare cancers of the head and neck on behalf of the REFCOR, part 1]. / Cancers rares de la tête et du cou sous l'égide du REFCOR, partie 1.

Among the 16,000 new cases of malignant tumors of the head and neck diagnosed in France each year, 10% are not conventional squamous cell carcinomas. These so-called rare cancers are distinguished by their presentation and patterns of failure, which is important to recognize in order to offer specific adapted management and maximize the chances of tumor control. These cancers can be rare by their histology, which determines their local invasiveness, and their hematogenous/nodal spread. Their diagnosis can be difficult and often requires comprehensive immunohistochemistry and genomic techniques. Expert pathology review is recommended in the cases of undifferentiated tumors, sarcomas and at the slightest diagnostic doubt. These rare cancers can also be rare by their anatomical location when arising from the paranasal sinuses, salivary glands and ear. Their location requires knowledge of their specific extension routes, and may call for a specific surgical technique (skull base endoscopic sinus surgery, extended total parotidectomy, etc.) and adapted radiotherapy to spare healthy organs surrounding the tumor. This article (part 1) discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic specificities of these rare cancers, and develops the recommendations of the French ENT Cancer Expertise Network (REFCOR) concerning rare epithelial tumors, i.e., salivary tumors, sinonasal tumors, variants of conventional squamous cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas, malignant odontogenic tumors, and ear tumors. A second article (part 2) is focused on non-epithelial tumors (sarcomas, mucosal melanomas, lymphomas, tumors of uncertain or undetermined malignancy) and describes the organization and missions of the REFCOR.

Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper gingiva and hard palate: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Despite sharing the same staging system as oral cavity cancers, upper gingiva and hard palate (UGHP) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have several features that make them a different entity. We aimed to analyze oncological outcomes and adverse prognostic factors of UGHP SCC, and assess an alternate T classification specific to UGHP SCC. METHODS: Retrospective bicentric study including all patients treated by surgery for a UGHP SCC between 2006 and 2021. RESULTS: We included 123 patients with a median age of 75 years. After a median follow-up of 45 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) were 57.3%, 52.7% and 74.7%, respectively. Perineural invasion, tumor size, bone invasion, pT classification and pN classification were statistically associated with poorer OS, DFS and LC on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, the following variable were statistically associated with a poorer OS: past history of HN radiotherapy (p = 0.018), age > 70 years (p = 0.005), perineural invasions (p = 0.019) and bone invasion (p = 0.030). Median survivals after isolated local recurrence were 17.7 and 3 months in case of surgical and non-surgical treatment, respectively (p = 0.066). The alternate classification allowed better patient distribution among T-categories, however without improving prognostication. CONCLUSION: There is a broad variety of clinical and pathological factors influencing prognosis of SCC of the UGHP. A comprehensive knowledge of their prognostic factors may pave the way towards a specific and more appropriate classification for these tumors.

Should an elective contralateral neck dissection be performed in midline-reaching squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx?

OBJECTIVE: to compare the rate of occult contralateral neck metastases (OCNM) in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) reaching or crossing the midline and to identify risk factors for OCNM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we conducted a single-center retrospective study of oral and oropharyngeal SCC with contralateral cN0 neck. The cohort was divided into a midline-reaching (MR; approaching the midline from up to 10 mm) group and a midline-crossing (MC; exceeding the midline by up to 10 mm) group. Clinical N-status was assessed by a radiologist specializing in head and neck imaging. All patients underwent contralateral elective neck dissection (END). RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included in this study, 59 in the MR group and 39 in the MC group. OCNM were present in 17.3% of patients, 20.3% in the MR group and 12.8% in the MC group (p = 0.336). In multivariable analysis, MR/MC status as well as distance from the midline (in mm) were not identified as risk factors for OCNM. Conversely, oropharyngeal primary and clinical N-status above N1 were significantly associated with a higher risk of OCNM, with odds ratios (OR) of 3.98 (95% CI = 1.08-14.60; p = 0.037) and 3.41 (95% CI = 1.07-10.85; p = 0.038) respectively. CONCLUSION: in patients with oral and oropharyngeal SCC extending close to or beyond the midline, tumor origin and clinical N-status should carry the most weight when dictating the indications for contralateral END, rather than the midline involvement in itself.

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: Advances and Residual Knowledge Gaps.

Minimally invasive surgery is a growing field in surgical oncology. After acquiring its first Food and Drug Administration approval in 2009 for T1-T2 malignancies of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has gained popularity thanks to its wristed instruments and magnified three-dimensional view, enhancing surgical comfort in remote-access areas. Its indications are expanding in the treatment of head and neck cancer, i.e., resection of tumors of the larynx, hypopharynx, or parapharyngeal space. However, this expansion must remain cautious and based on high-level evidence, in order to guarantee safety and oncological outcomes which are comparable to conventional approaches. This narrative review assesses the current role of TORS in head and neck cancer from an evidence-based perspective, and then identifies what knowledge gaps remain to be addressed.

Evolution of the Incidence of Oral Cavity Cancers in the Elderly from 1990 to 2018.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the evolution of the incidence of oral cavity cancers (OCC) among elderly patients in France between 1990 and 2018 and to compare it to the incidence of other cancers sharing the same main risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The incidence of cancers in mainland France from 1990 to 2018 was estimated from incidence data observed in every cancer registry of the Francim network. Incidence was modeled by a 2-dimensional penalized spline of age and year of diagnosis, associated with a random effect corresponding to the registry. The elderly population was divided into two groups: 70-79 years old and ≥80 years old. RESULTS: There was a 72% increase in the number of OCC cases in women over 70 years of age between the periods 1990-1999 and 2010-2018. As for men, there was a stabilization in the number of cases (+2%). Over the same period, for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers, there was a decrease in incidence in elderly men and an increase in elderly women, although less marked than for OCC. CONCLUSIONS: Since the 1990s, the incidence of OCC has been increasing in elderly subjects in France, particularly in women. Population aging and growth or alcohol and tobacco consumption alone do not seem to explain this increase, which is not observed in the same proportions for other upper aerodigestive tract cancer subsites sharing the same main risk factors.

Outcomes of comprehensive geriatric assessment and surgical management in head and neck cancers of the elderly: an observational study.

AIM: The aims of this study were to assess the survival benefit of optimal vs suboptimal management in elderly patients presenting with upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancer for which surgery was the standard of care, and determine if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was a prognostic factor for survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2018. Included patients were aged 70 or older at the time of diagnosis, and presented with UADT cancer with a theoretical indication for curative-intent surgery according to international guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were included, with a median age of 78 years. Treatment included surgery in 67.6% of cases and was considered optimal in 60.6% of patients. The overall 3-year survival was 55.2%, and was significantly better in case of optimal vs suboptimal treatment (74.5% vs 25.8%, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, factors associated with a significantly improved 3-year survival included surgery (p < 0.001), age < 80 years, performance status < 2 and G8 score > 14. In multivariate analysis, CGA was associated with a better survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged over 70 presenting with UADT cancer for which the standard of care is surgery, an optimal management is associated with better overall survival. Receiving a CGA seems to provide a survival benefit in patients with a G8 score ≤ 14, through an optimization of the care pathway before and after the cancer treatment.

Paratracheal lymph node dissection during total (pharyngo-)laryngectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to determine the rate and risk factors of paratracheal lymph node (PTLN) involvement during total laryngectomy (TL) or total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL). In addition, we aimed to assess its prognostic significance in terms of survival and peristomal recurrence. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. We searched for studies reporting outcomes of PTLN dissection during radical laryngeal surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, hypopharynx or cervical oesophagus. RESULTS: We included a total of ten studies (838 patients). The overall rate of PTLN dissection positivity was 18.6% (20.7% for primary TL, 8.7% for salvage TL). Random-effects meta-analysis identified T4 stage, N+ stage of the lateral neck, subglottis involvement and primary tumour arising from the hypopharynx or cervical oesophagus as significant risk factors for PTLN involvement. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis allowed to better define the risk of PTLN involvement during TL or TPL, in a bid to guide indication for PTLN dissection. There is a need for further large studies reporting rigorously the outcomes of PTLN dissection in order to establish stronger evidence-based recommendations.

Salvage total glossectomy and total glosso-laryngectomy: Are they worth it? A GETTEC French multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Salvage total glossectomy (TG) or total glosso-laryngectomy (TGL) remain controversial, as highly morbid procedures. The objective was to describe oncological and functional outcomes after salvage TG or TGL. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study, including patients with previous neck irradiation undergoing TG or TGL for squamous cell carcinoma involving the base of tongue. RESULTS: We included 42 patients: 27 in the TG group and 15 in the TGL group. For the entire cohort, median OS and DFS were estimated at 19 months (95% IC [14-44]) and 10 months (95% IC [7-13]) respectively, with no difference between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 90 months, 10 patients (24%) were alive and free of disease. Att he end of follow-up, we noted a gastrostomy dependency of 89% and 87 %respectively in the TG and TGL group, and 48% of patients in the TG group had a tracheotomy. CONCLUSION: Although local control is difficult to achieve after salvage TG or TGL, these procedures are associated with acceptable survival and chance of cure for a last-resort situation. TG and TGL can be proposed in selected motivated patients after careful shared decision-making.

The impact of physician's characteristics on decision-making inhead and neck oncology: Results of a national survey.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the socio-professional and behavioral factors influencing decision-making between surgical and non-surgical treatment in Upper AeroDigestive Tract (UADT) oncology among surgeons and oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide online survey among surgeons and medical or radiation oncologists treating head and neck cancer patients in France. The questionnaire collected physicians' demographics, type of practice, individual behavioral characteristics (attitudes toward risk and uncertainty) and data on decision-making via clinical case scenarios. RESULTS: In total, 197 questionnaires were usable. Clinical case scenarios were grouped into three categories according to the prognostic and functional impact of the choice between surgical or non-surgical treatment. For clinical case scenarios where evidence-based medicine considered surgery as the best option, surgeons were significantly more likely to offer surgery in multivariable analysis. When surgery and non-surgical treatment were equivalent, multivariable analysis showed that the tendency to offer surgery increased with the physician's age, and decreased as the number of patients treated per year increased. When non-surgical treatment was the best option because of very high surgical morbidity, multivariable analysis showed a higher propensity to opt for surgery for the age group 40 - 59 versus 25 - 39, and a lower likelihood of choosing surgery among oncologists. CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on the physicians' socio-professional and behavioral factors influencing decision-making in UADT oncology. These mechanisms, poorly studied and probably underestimated, partly explain the variability of the decisions taken when confronted with clinical situations that are subject to debate. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT03663985.

Rigid versus flexible endoscopy for managing ingested foreign bodies-can we improve pathways?

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate management pathways, outcomes and safety of rigid endoscopy (RE) and flexible endoscopy (FE) for the treatment of impacted foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT) in adults. METHODS: Retrospective study, included all patients undergoing RE or FE for impacted UGIT foreign body over an 11-year-period. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included (95 FE and 49 RE). FE were performed under local anaesthetic or sedation, and RE under GA. Success rate of FE and RE were 95.8% and 95.9% respectively. During FE an intra-procedural biopsy was performed in 45/95 (47.3%); with 26/95(27.4%) identifying mucosal pathology. Complications was significantly higher in patients having RE (40.8% versus 6.3%, p = .001). CONCLUSION: FE and RE are effective for the therapeutic management of impacted UGIT foreign bodies. However, FE can be performed under LA and was associated with fewer complications, favouring FE where possible as a first line option.

Airway management during transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers: a French GETTEC group survey.

PURPOSE: The aim of the survey was to define the indications for preventive tracheostomy in transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for head and neck cancers. METHODS: From October 2019 to January 2020, an online questionnaire was e-mailed to French surgical ENT teams with considerable experience of the TORS procedure (Gettec group). A descriptive analysis of the answers was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen French surgical teams answered the questionnaire. For 77.8% of the surgical teams, a past history of radiotherapy with residual edema was an indication for prophylactic tracheostomy, and for 88.9%, > 75 mg of antiplatelet medication or anticoagulation treatment was an indication. CONCLUSION: Early preventive tracheostomy during TORS can protect airway from uncommon but potentially life-threatening complications, such as transoral hemorrhage or airway edema. We recommend it in high-risk situations, such as a past history of radiotherapy or antiplatelet therapy associated with large resections. Further studies are needed to establish evidence-based recommendations.

Adjuvant brachytherapy for oral squamous cell carcinomas: a single-center experience comparing low-dose and pulsed-dose-rate techniques.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the outcomes of adjuvant interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to the tumor bed for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and to compare the oncological outcomes and toxicity profile of low-dose-rate (LDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) BT. DESIGN: This retrospective single-center study included all patients who underwent postoperative LDR- or PDR-BT to the tumor bed as the sole adjuvant treatment for an oral tongue or floor of the mouth SCC between January 2000 and December 2020. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were eligible for this study. The cohort was divided into an LDR group (n = 38) and a PDR group (n = 41). The median time interval between surgery and brachytherapy was 55 days. Median delivered total dose was 55 Gy and median hospital stay was 5 days. Five patients (8.3%) experienced grade 3-4 early toxicity, 2 in the LDR group and 3 in the PDR group. Late toxicities were present in 28 patients (44.4%) and were dominated by grade 1-2 residual pain and dysesthesia, without a statistical difference between the groups. After a median follow-up of 65.1 months, 5­year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort were 76.3% (95% CI = 63.4-85.1), 61.6% (95% CI = 49.0-72.0), and 71.4% (95% CI = 58.6-80.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant BT after excision of oral cavity SCC provides satisfactory oncological outcomes along with good tolerance. In our study, PDR-BT showed similar oncological and functional results to LDR-BT in this indication.

Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage transoral robotic surgery: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as a first-line therapy has been well-documented but evidence is missing regarding salvage therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of TORS as a primary and salvage therapy. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study included 74 patients operated by a single surgeon and sorted out into two groups: primary treatment (PT) or Salvage treatment (ST) in case of previous history of radiation therapy. Patients were further stratified by tumour location: larynx and pharynx (lST vs lPT and pST vs pPT). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in PT group (64.9%) and 26 in ST group (35.1%). ST patients had more frequent cTis/T1 tumours (57.7% vs 29.2%, p = 0.0164) and no clinical lymph disease (3.8% vs 37.5%, p = 0.0016). Tracheostomy was more often performed in the ST group (57.7% vs 16.7%, p = 0.0003) and the lST subgroup (88.9% vs 9.1%, p < 0.0001). Gastric feeding tube placement was more frequent in the ST group (76.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.0003), the pST subgroup (64.7% vs 15.4%, p = 0.0009) and the lST subgroup (100% vs 54.5%, p = 0.0297). We observed a trend for more postoperative complications in the ST group (69.2% vs 47.9%, p = 0.0783). The overall survival was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0004), and in the pST subgroup (p < 0.0001). The disease-free survival rate was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0001), the pST subgroup (p = 0.0002) and the lST subgroup (p = 0.0328). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that survival and functional outcomes after salvage TORS are worse than in first line surgery.